Impact of positive legionella urinary antigen test on patient management and improvement of antibiotic use

17Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To assess the incidence of legionella infection over a 27 month period at a large university hospital. Material and Methods: The present retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with legionellosis, defined as those presenting a positive urinary antigen for legionella together with a medical history, clinical findings, and radiological findings consistent with pneumonia. These patients were evaluated to determine the relation between their test results and changes in treatment modalities. A control group of patients with pneumonia but a negative urinary antigen test for legionella were also analysed. Results: Twenty seven of 792 assessed patients tested positive for legionella. In 22 of these patients, legionella active antibiotics were administered empirically. In seven patients, the test results prompted a legionella specific treatment, whereas in 12 cases, non-specific antibiotics were stopped within 24 hours. Overall, treatment was altered in more than half of the patients as a result of the test results. Conclusions: The urinary antigen may have a direct impact on clinical management of pulmonary legionellosis. However, patient comorbidities and individual clinical judgment are still important for determining the best treatment to be given in each individual case.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garbino, J., Bornand, J. E., Uçkay, I., Fonseca, S., & Sax, H. (2004). Impact of positive legionella urinary antigen test on patient management and improvement of antibiotic use. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 57(12), 1302–1305. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2004.018861

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free