A type graph model for java programs

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this work we present a type graph that models all executable constructs of the Java programming language. Such a model is useful for any graph-based technique that relies on a representation of Java programs as graphs. The model can be regarded as a common representation to which all Java syntax graphs must adhere. We also present the systematic approach that is being taken to generate syntax graphs from Java code. Since the type graph model is comprehensive, i.e., covers the whole language specification, the technique is guaranteed to generate a corresponding graph for any valid Java program. In particular, we want to extract such syntax graphs in order to perform static analysis and model checking of programs written in Java. Although we focus on Java, this same approach could be adapted for other programming languages. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

References Powered by Scopus

The GROOVE simulator: A tool for state space generation

221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defining object-oriented execution semantics using graph transformations

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Creating and reconciling diagrams after executing model transformations

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The edge of graph transformation-graphs for behavioural specification

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ontologically correct taxonomies by construction

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using graph transformations and graph abstractions for software verification

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rensink, A., & Zambon, E. (2009). A type graph model for java programs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5522 LNCS, pp. 237–242). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02138-1_18

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

Researcher 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 6

86%

Psychology 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free