Studying Invisibly: Media Naturalness and Learning

  • Blau I
  • Caspi A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study examines differences between two learning environments: audio-written conferencing and traditional face-to-face instruction. We investigated whether medium richness [media richness theory; Daft and Lengel (Research in organizational behavior. JAI, Greenwich, 1984)], medium naturalness [media nat-uralness theory; Kock (IEEE Trans Prof Commun 48(2):117–130, 2005)], and invisibility influence students' achievement, satisfaction, and behavior. In two research settings, a field study and a laboratory experiment, students were taught face-to-face and/or via an audio-written conferencing system; subject matter and teacher were constant. We found similar achievement in the two environments. Significant differences, in favor of face-to-face communication, were found regard-ing learner satisfaction. In addition, invisibility increased certain kinds of students' behavior: participation, risk taking, immediacy feeling, and flaming. These find-ings were explained in terms of differences in media naturalness and as an effect of invisibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blau, I., & Caspi, A. (2010). Studying Invisibly: Media Naturalness and Learning (pp. 193–216). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6139-6_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free