Datum-wise classification: A sequential approach to sparsity

35Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We propose a novel classification technique whose aim is to select an appropriate representation for each datapoint, in contrast to the usual approach of selecting a representation encompassing the whole dataset. This datum-wise representation is found by using a sparsity inducing empirical risk, which is a relaxation of the standard L0 regularized risk. The classification problem is modeled as a sequential decision process that sequentially chooses, for each datapoint, which features to use before classifying. Datum-Wise Classification extends naturally to multi-class tasks, and we describe a specific case where our inference has equivalent complexity to a traditional linear classifier, while still using a variable number of features. We compare our classifier to classical L1 regularized linear models (L 1-SVM and LARS) on a set of common binary and multi-class datasets and show that for an equal average number of features used we can get improved performance using our method. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

References Powered by Scopus

Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming

7326Citations
962Readers

Your institution provides access to this article.

Least angle regression

7020Citations
3192Readers

L<inf>1/2</inf> regularization

434Citations
94Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Classification with costly features using deep reinforcement learning

61Citations
105Readers

Interactive hybrid approach to combine machine and human intelligence for personalized rehabilitation assessment

26Citations
67Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dulac-Arnold, G., Denoyer, L., Preux, P., & Gallinari, P. (2011). Datum-wise classification: A sequential approach to sparsity. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6911 LNAI, pp. 375–390). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23780-5_34

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘21‘23‘24‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

53%

Researcher 6

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 17

85%

Engineering 2

10%

Mathematics 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0