Long-term functional results after surgical treatment of parapneumonic thoracic empyema

44Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Retrospective evaluation of long-term functional results of surgical treatment of chronic pleural empyema. Two different surgical procedures (debridement vs. decortication) and approaches (VATS vs. thoracotomy) were analyzed. Three end-points were considered: short-term surgical results, short- and long-term radiological results, clinico-functional long-term results. Fifty-one debridement (52% VATS, 48% thoracotomy) and 68 decortication were performed. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 1.5% and 24%, respectively. Older age (>70 years old) had worse postoperative morbidity (P=0.048). Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) debridement had lower postoperative hospital stay (P=0.006) and shorter duration of chest drainage (P=0.006). The infectious process was resolved in all patients. All patients presented a postoperative radiological improvement, 63 patients (60%) with a complete pulmonary re-expansion. Sixty patients (58%) referred a complete respiratory recovery. VATS debridement had a greater improvement in subjective dyspnea degree (P=0.041). The longterm spirometric evaluation was normal in 58 patients (56%). Age >70 years old resulted the only variable associated to poor long-term results (FEV1% <60% andyor MRC grade ≥2) at multivariate analysis. Surgical treatment of pleural empyema achieves excellent long-term respiratory outcomes. VATS is associated to less postoperative mortality and shorter postoperative hospital stay. In elderly patients, postoperative morbidity could be higher and long-term functional improvement less warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casali, C., Storelli, E. S., Di Prima, E., & Morandi, U. (2009). Long-term functional results after surgical treatment of parapneumonic thoracic empyema. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 9(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2009.203190

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free