The Legality of Doctrine of Frustration in the Realm of Covid-19 Pandemic

  • Jayabalan S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19-Outbreak”) has a potential impact in the performance of a contract.  If a contract does not contain a force majeure clause, a contracting party may look to the common law doctrine of frustration to relieve it from its obligations.  Unlike force majeure clauses which focuses on the parties' express intention on how to deal with supervening events, frustration is implied by law and thus would only be considered in the absence of an express force majeure clause. In Malaysia, the doctrine of frustration is codified in section 57(2) of the Contracts Act 1957. A doctrinal analogy of the doctrine of frustration and section 57 of the Contracts Act 1950 indicates a pandemic such as the covid-19 would not frustrate a contract. Force majeure clause should be used as a protective tool to prevent losses to the contracting parties or alternatively the Principles of European Contract Law and the Unidroit Principles that make provisions for hardship as well as force majeure should be implemented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jayabalan, S. (2020). The Legality of Doctrine of Frustration in the Realm of Covid-19 Pandemic. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 3(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.3.2.1900.84-90

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free