Work analysis and the resolution of organizational conflict: Theoretical method, measurement and application

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Interventions for conflict or stressors at work are derailed for a variety of factors such as diagnostic heuristics, inadequate resource utilization, workplace political behavior, insufficient boundary management, criterion deficiency or contamination or value-laden dynamics. Derailed interventions and workplace conflict are often effectively moderated through a calibrated, reflective process in which work analysis serves as the foundation for change. This chapter summarizes the use of work analysis to resolve conflict or derailed interventions in a university setting. Twenty-nine cases are part of this analysis. Each case includes responses from three parties or work roles. All cases are catalogued according to work location. The identified type of initial conflict is also linked to each case. Finally, the job category of each participant is another variable used as part of this analysis. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) displays significant differences in the stressors: required training, tools: machines, and values (all significant at p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hunter, J. (2015). Work analysis and the resolution of organizational conflict: Theoretical method, measurement and application. In Derailed Organizational Interventions for Stress and Well-Being: Confessions of Failure and Solutions for Success (pp. 253–259). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9867-9_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free