High-Performance Work Practices and Employee Wellbeing—Does Health-Oriented Leadership Make a Difference?

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper sheds further light on the contextual boundaries in the relationship between high-performance work practices (HPWPs) and employee wellbeing. In particular, we analyze whether this relationship is moderated by health-oriented leadership behavior (i.e., staff care) which describes the extent to which leaders value, are aware of, and protect their followers’ health at work. Our analyses are based on employee data (N = 1,345) from Germany, covering two points in time. Findings show positive associations between HPWPs and happiness-related (i.e., engagement, commitment) and health-related (i.e., general health, physical health complaints, mental health complaints, strain) wellbeing outcomes. The positive relationship between HPWPs and employee wellbeing is weaker the more employees experience leadership behavior in terms of staff care. Thus, our results provide further evidence for a substitutive or compensatory effect between HRM and leadership.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hauff, S., Krick, A., Klebe, L., & Felfe, J. (2022). High-Performance Work Practices and Employee Wellbeing—Does Health-Oriented Leadership Make a Difference? Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833028

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

17%

Researcher 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 11

58%

Psychology 5

26%

Engineering 2

11%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free