Improved 4-compartment body-composition model for a clinically accessible measure of total body protein1-3

45Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Muscle wasting is a consequence of many primary conditions including sarcopenia, cachexia, osteoporosis, HIV/AIDS, and chronic kidney disease. Unfortunately, there is not a clinically accessible method to measure total body protein, which is the functional mass of muscle. Objective: We sought to derive a simple method to measure total body protein by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA). Design: We retrospectively analyzed a clinical convenience sample of individuals with numerous metabolic conditions from the Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia, who had a concurrent protein measure by using neutron activation analysis-derived protein (NAA-TBPro), water measure by using BIA, and whole-body DXA scan. The study was split into calibration and validation data sets by using simple random sampling stratified by sex, BMI category, and age decade. We generated a protein estimate directcalibration protein (DC-TBPro) derived from BIA water, bone mass, and body volume.We compared NAA-TBPro with DC-TBPro and 2 protein estimates from the literature, one that used the DC-TBPro equation with fixed coefficients [4-compartment Lohman method for analysis of total body protein (4CL-TBPro)] and another that used fat-free mass, age, and sex [Wang equation-derived protein (W-TBPro)]. Results: A total of 187 participants [119 women; mean (6SD) age: 37.0 6 15.4 y; mean (6SD) BMI (in kg/m2) 24.5 6 7.7] were included. When plotted against NAA-TBPro, DC-TBPro had the highest correlation [coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.87], lowest root mean squared error (RMSE; 0.87 kg), and fewest outliers compared with 4CL-TBPro (R2 = 0.75; RMSE = 1.22 kg) and W-TBPro (R2 = 0.80; RMSE = 1.10 kg). Conclusions: A simple method to measure total body protein by using a DXA system and BIA unit was developed and compared with NAA as proof of principle. With additional validation, this method could provide a clinically useful way to monitor musclewasting conditions. © 2013 American Society for Nutrition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilson, J. P., Strauss, B. J., Fan, B., Duewer, F. W., & Shepherd, J. A. (2013). Improved 4-compartment body-composition model for a clinically accessible measure of total body protein1-3. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 97(3), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.048074

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free