Mesoscale distribution patterns of Amazonian understorey herbs in relation to topography, soil and watersheds

178Citations
Citations of this article
432Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

1 Many authors have suggested that topography and soils are the major determinants of species distributions and community patterns at small or regional scales, but few studies addressed the patterns at mesoscales. We used Reserva Ducke (100 km2) as a model to analyse the effects of soil, topography and watersheds on the variation of the herb community composition, and to determine the relative importance of the environmental factors on species composition. 2 Taxonomic groups are frequently used as surrogates in studies of biodiversity distribution and complementarity, but their efficacy is controversial. We therefore studied the correlations between the distributional patterns of three different herb groups (Marantaceae, pteridophytes and 'others') and their responses to environmental predictors. 3 Terrestrial herbs were sampled in 59 plots of 250 × 2 m, systematically distributed over the reserve. Plots followed isoclines of altitude, to minimize the internal variation of soil. Composition of the total herb community and of the three herb groups was summarized with PCoA. 4 Soil structure, represented by PCA axes, was the main determinant of the variation in herb composition for all groups, but slope affected only pteridophytes. Soil and topography explained less than one-third of the variance in community data. Herb composition was significantly different between watersheds, but watersheds differ only slightly in soil parameters. Our results indicate high turnover in species composition, on spatial scales of 5-10 km in central Amazonia, which is not necessarily associated with soil change. 5 Compositional patterns of the three groups analysed were significantly correlated, but with low values for the correlation coefficient. Although composition was correlated, the responses to environmental predictors differed among groups, and the use of one group as a surrogate will miss around 50% of the variation in other groups. 6 Although important, soil and topography alone cannot predict herb community structure. Knowledge of geographical, historical or other landscape features, such as watershed morphology, may therefore be necessary to predict the turnover patterns over mesoscales. Moreover, the same factors may not have the same effectiveness as predictors of the structure of seemingly similar biological groups. © 2005 British Ecological Society.

References Powered by Scopus

Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: A useful method of constrained ordination for ecology

2091Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance

1531Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination

1367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Variation in aboveground tree live biomass in a central Amazonian Forest: Effects of soil and topography

295Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Embolism resistance drives the distribution of Amazonian rainforest tree species along hydro-topographic gradients

130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conceptual and empirical advances in Neotropical biodiversity research

120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Costa, F. R. C., Magnusson, W. E., & Luizao, R. C. (2005). Mesoscale distribution patterns of Amazonian understorey herbs in relation to topography, soil and watersheds. Journal of Ecology, 93(5), 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01020.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 207

61%

Researcher 70

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 57

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 255

69%

Environmental Science 90

25%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 16

4%

Engineering 6

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free