The accurate assessment and diagnosis of combat injuries are the basis for triage and treatment of combat casualties. A consensus on the assessment and diagnosis of combat injuries was made and discussed at the second annual meeting of the Professional Committee on Disaster Medicine of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA). In this consensus agreement, the massive hemorrhage, airway, respiration, circulation and hypothermia (MARCH) algorithm, which is a simple triage and rapid treatment and field triage score, was recommended to assess combat casualties during the first-aid stage, whereas the abbreviated scoring method for combat casualty and the MARCH algorithm were recommended to assess combat casualties in level II facilities. In level III facilities, combined measures, including a history inquiry, thorough physical examination, laboratory examination, X-ray, and ultrasound examination, were recommended for the diagnosis of combat casualties. In addition, corresponding methods were recommended for the recognition of casualties needing massive transfusions, assessment of firearm wounds, evaluation of mangled extremities, and assessment of injury severity in this consensus.
CITATION STYLE
Zong, Z. wen, Zhang, L. yang, Qin, H., Chen, S. xu, Zhang, L., Yang, L., … Zhou, S. hu. (2018). Expert consensus on the evaluation and diagnosis of combat injuries of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. Military Medical Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-018-0152-y
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.