Francesco Guala once wrote that ‘The problem of extrapolation (or external validity as it is sometimes called) is a minor scandal in the philosophy of science’. This paper agrees with the statement, but for reasons different from Guala’s. The scandal is not, or not any longer, that the problem has been ignored in the philosophy of science. The scandal is that framing the problem as one of external validity encourages poor evidential reasoning. The aim of this paper is to propose an alternative—an alternative which constitutes much better evidential reasoning about target systems of interest, and which makes do without (much) consideration of external validity.
CITATION STYLE
Reiss, J. (2019). Against external validity. Synthese, 196(8), 3103–3121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1796-6
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.