Competitive species interactions constrain abiotic adaptation in a bacterial soil community

29Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Studies of abiotic adaptation often consider single species in isolation, yet natural communities contain many coexisting species which could limit or promote abiotic adaptation. Here we show, using soil bacterial communities, that evolving in the presence of a competitor constrained abiotic adaptation. Specifically, Pseudomonas fluorescens evolved alone was fitter than P. fluorescens evolved alongside Pseudomonas putida, when P. putida was absent. Genome analyses indicated this was due to mutation of the acetate scavenger actP, which occurred exclusively, and almost universally, in single-species-evolved clones. actP disruption was associated with increased growth in soil compared with wild-type actP, but this benefit was abolished when P. putida was present, suggesting a role for carbon scavenging transporters in species interactions, possibly through nutrient competition. Our results show that competitive species interactions can limit the evolutionary response to abiotic selection, because the fitness benefits of abiotic adaptive mutations were negated in more complex communities.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

105Citations
318Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text
80Citations
255Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hall, J. P. J., Harrison, E., & Brockhurst, M. A. (2018, December 1). Competitive species interactions constrain abiotic adaptation in a bacterial soil community. Evolution Letters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.83

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

57%

Researcher 18

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27

47%

Immunology and Microbiology 12

21%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 11

19%

Environmental Science 7

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free