University Entrance Examinations in Spain: Using the Construct Comparability Approach to Analyze Standards Quality

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, important methodological attempts have been made to explore the comparability of examination standards, especially in the context of certifications and university entrance. The present study aimed to explore the use of a construct comparability approach through a comparative analysis of the academic scores on 15 subjects from Spanish University Entrance Examinations in the Valencian Community, with a sample of 22,996 students in the call of June 2018. We employed the Rasch partial credit model as an estimation method, counting each subject as the item of an instrument related to academic achievement. The results confirmed the unidimensionality assumption and the goodness of fit of the model in relation to all subjects, although no discrimination between high and low ability students was detected because of the lack of monotonicity of the score categories. We observed that the level of difficulty of the subjects was appropriate to the students’ ability levels. Important conclusions have been drawn for the improvement of the standard qualification process, and future research directions have been proposed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Veas, A., Navas, L., Pozo-Rico, T., & Miñano, P. (2020). University Entrance Examinations in Spain: Using the Construct Comparability Approach to Analyze Standards Quality. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00127

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free