Bayle and Pyrrhonism: Antinomy, Method, and History

6Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Bayle’s “sceptical method of antinomy” is of enduring historical interest, since so many figures of the period discussed it, including Hume, Kant, and Hegel. In the paper, I examine Bayle’s own definition of scepticism, and exhibit his scepticism at work in the writing of his Dictionary. The first part shows how the sceptical method is built into the very idea of a critique and Bayle’s philosophical reflections. Then, I turn to the application of the sceptical method in the Dictionnary. Finally, I compare Bayle’s use of this method and Sextus’ use, showing the novelties introduced by him.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, P. J. (2013). Bayle and Pyrrhonism: Antinomy, Method, and History. In International Archives of the History of Ideas/Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idees (Vol. 210, pp. 19–30). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free