Evaluating two-stage network structures: Bargaining game approach

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter presents a Nash bargaining game model to measure the performance of two-stage decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The two stages are viewed as players to bargain for a better payoff, which is represented by DEA ratio efficiency score. The efficiency model is developed as a cooperative game model. It is shown that when only one intermediate measure exists between the two stages, the newly-developed bargaining approach yields the same results as applying the standard DEA approach to each stage separately.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Du, J., Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Liang, L., & Zhu, J. (2014). Evaluating two-stage network structures: Bargaining game approach. In International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (Vol. 208, pp. 165–187). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8068-7_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free