Cholesterol reduction and non-illness mortality: Meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

150Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between cholesterol lowering interventions and risk of death from suicide, accident, or trauma (non-illness mortality). Design: Meta-analysis of the non-illness mortality outcomes of large, randomised clinical trials of cholesterol lowering treatments. Studies reviewed: 19 out of 21 eligible trials that had data available on non-illness mortality. Interventions reviewed: Dietary modification, drug treatment, or partial ileal bypass surgery for 1-10 years. Main outcome measure: Deaths from suicides, accidents, and violence in treatment groups compared with control groups. Results: Across all trials, the odds ratio of non-illness mortality in the treated groups, relative to control groups, was 1.18 (95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.52; P = 0.20). The odds ratios were 1.28 (0.94 to 1.74; P = 0.12) for primary prevention trials and 1.00 (0.65 to 1.55; P = 0.98) for secondary prevention trials. Randomised clinical trials using statins did not show a treatment related rise in non-illness mortality (0.84, 0.50 to 1.41; P = 0.50), whereas a trend toward increased deaths from suicide and violence was observed in trials of dietary interventions and non-statin drugs (1.32, 0.98 to 1.77; P = 0.06). No relation was found between the magnitude of cholesterol reduction and non-illness mortality (P = 0.23). Conclusion: Currently available evidence does not indicate that non-illness mortality is increased significantly by cholesterol lowering treatments. A modest increase may occur with dietary interventions and non-statin drugs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muldoon, M. F., Manuck, S. B., Mendelsohn, A. B., Kaplan, J. R., & Belle, S. H. (2001). Cholesterol reduction and non-illness mortality: Meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 322(7277), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7277.11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free