Shear capacity prediction of confined masonry walls subjected to cyclic lateral loading

13Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study describes an analytical proposal to predict lateral shear capacity of confined masonry walls that fail by diagonal splitting, where the maximum shear is evaluated as the dowel action of confined columns' reinforcement added to the shear capacity of the plain masonry panel. In order to validate the proposed approach, experimental test results and gathered data from literature were used. The experimental tests concerned two confined clay brick walls subjected to different level of gravity load and cyclic lateral loading. The applicability of some empirical formulae found in literature regarding the stiffness degradation was investigated. Good correlation between the predicted lateral resistance using the proposed approach and all data was achieved.

References Powered by Scopus

Seismic behaviour of confined masonry walls

154Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimental and analytical studies on earthquake resisting behaviour of confined concrete block masonry structures

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seismic shear capacity of reinforced masonry piers

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Force-displacement model for solid confined masonry walls with shear-dominated failure mode

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of seismic design provisions for confined masonry using experimental and numerical approaches

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A unified model for the seismic analysis of brick masonry structures

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bourzam, A., Goto, T., & Miyajima, M. (2008). Shear capacity prediction of confined masonry walls subjected to cyclic lateral loading. Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering, 25(2), 692–704. https://doi.org/10.2208/jsceseee.25.47s

Readers over time

‘15‘17‘18‘19‘22‘2301234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

25%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 9

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0