The impact of tax and expenditure limitations on user fees and charges in local government finance: Evidence from New England

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

American local government financing shifted fromtaxation toward user fees and charges (UFCs) in the late1970s, with substantial efficiency and equity implications. Normatively, the shift aligns with the benefit principle; positively, the shift is often attributed to tax revolts. We test the two associations via a difference-In-differences design and a fiscal stringency measure of tax and expenditure limitations (TELs); we also test the moderating effects of overrides on TELs. Our results confirm that state-Imposed TELs caused the shift in local public finance; the results are robust to change of sample and empirical strategy. This article helps explain the relationship between tax revolts and non-tax revenue and provides evidence that fiscal constraints imposed by a higher level government on a constituent level can have significant effects, Including effects beyond the intent of the constraints' framers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, P., & Hou, Y. (2020). The impact of tax and expenditure limitations on user fees and charges in local government finance: Evidence from New England. Publius, 50(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjz020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free