Expressive Voting in Autocracies: A Theory of Non-Economic Participation with Evidence from Cameroon

16Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Why do people vote in autocratic elections? Until now, most answers to this question have argued that people vote because they expect a material reward, such as patronage or a direct transfer via vote-buying, or as a way of rewarding the regime for its economic performance. I argue that citizens also vote for different non-economic, expressive reasons, such as a sense of civic duty or a desire to improve the democratic process. I present data from an original quasi-national public-opinion survey conducted in Cameroon, which shows that expressive reasons for voting can explain more variation in voting behavior than economic reasons. These different motivations challenge the implications of existing models of democratization by explaining how some of the poorest electoral autocracies have withstood decades of economic stagnation.

References Powered by Scopus

Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war

3127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sensitive Questions in Surveys

2161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Theory of the Calculus of Voting

1722Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Opposing Power: Building Opposition Alliances in Electoral Autocracies

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ethnic Bias in Judicial Decision Making: Evidence from Criminal Appeals in Kenya

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Civic duty and voting under autocracy

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Letsa, N. W. (2020, June 1). Expressive Voting in Autocracies: A Theory of Non-Economic Participation with Evidence from Cameroon. Perspectives on Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719001002

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 14

74%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

21%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free