Cellular senescence is a critical stress response program implicated in embryonic development, wound healing, aging, and immunity, and it backs up apoptosis as an ultimate cell-cycle exit mechanism. In analogy to replicative exhaustion of telomereeroded cells, premature types of senescence—referring to oncogene-, therapy-, or virus-induced senescence—are widely considered irreversible growth arrest states as well. We discuss here that entry into full-featured senescence is not necessarily a permanent endpoint, but dependent on essential maintenance components, potentially transient. Unlike a binary state switch, we view senescence with its extensive epigenomic reorganization, profound cytomorphological remodeling, and distinctive metabolic rewiring rather as a journey toward a full-featured arrest condition of variable strength and depth. Senescence-underlying maintenance-essential molecular mechanisms may allow cell-cycle reentry if not continuously provided. Importantly, senescent cells that resumed proliferation fundamentally differ from those that never entered senescence, and hence would not reflect a reversion but a dynamic progression to a post-senescent state that comes with distinct functional and clinically relevant ramifications.
CITATION STYLE
Reimann, M., Lee, S., & Schmitt, C. A. (2024). Cellular senescence: Neither irreversible nor reversible. Journal of Experimental Medicine. Rockefeller University Press. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20232136
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.