With the aid of a series of interlinked empirical investigations, we attempt to systematically determine whether and to what extent the norms that ordinary arguers generally speaking take (or say they take) into account when participating in argumentative discourse are in accordance with the rules of the ideal model of critical discussion. To exclude interfering variables and to be able to track the influence of various factors on the judgment concerning the permissibility of certain discussion moves, experimental research was performed in which constructed discussion fragments were employed in which a particular pragma-dialectical discussion rule was sometimes, and sometimes not, violated. In brief, constructed dialogues were used in which a fallacy was committed, or not committed, by the discussion participants.
CITATION STYLE
van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2009). Considerations regarding the design of the study. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 16, pp. 31–50). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.