Evaluating the efficacy of commercial kits for viral DNA/RNA extraction

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Extraction of viral DNA/RNA from environmental samples as part of the analytical procedure in quantifying waterborne viruses, is of great importance. In this study, two commercially available kits were compared to assess their performance, the MO BIO PowerViral Environmental DNA/RNA Isolation kit and the Qiagen QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit. A performance assessment of extraction kits for detecting and quantifying six human enteric viruses as the commonest waterborne pathogens and one plant virus as an alternative fecal indicator has been carried out using quantitative PCR (qPCR). Water samples were collected from seven sites in Singapore during March and April 2015. In general, a strong association was observed between two different viral DNA/ RNA extraction kits and detection frequency of targets (P = 0.017). The Qiagen kit showed higher extraction efficiency than the MoBio kit. However, in terms of quantification, a significant difference was only observed in the occurrences of NoV GI and PMMoV between two different kits (P < 0.05), although the kits showed similar efficiency removing qPCR inhibitors. The Qiagen kit was preferred for routine water quality monitoring.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saeidi, N., Gu, X., Goh, S. G., Xin, C. L. Y., & Gin, K. Y. H. (2017). Evaluating the efficacy of commercial kits for viral DNA/RNA extraction. Water Practice and Technology, 12(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2017.015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free