Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: Use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial

461Citations
Citations of this article
280Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To investigate the prognostic and predictive significance of subtyping node-positive early breast cancer by immunohistochemistry in a clinical trial of a docetaxel-containing regimen.Methods Pathologic data from a central laboratory were available for 1,350 patients (91 %) from the BCIRG 001 trial of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) for operable node-positive breast cancer. Patients were classified by tumor characteristics as (1) triple negative (estrogen receptor [ER]-negative, progesterone receptor [PR]-negative, HER2/neu [HER2]-negative), (2) HER2 (HER2-positive, ER-negative, PR-negative), (3) luminal B (ER-positive and/or PR-positive and either HER2-positive and/or Ki67hlgh), and (4) luminal A (ER-positive and/or PR-positive and not HER2-positive or Ki67hlgh), and assessed for prognostic significance and response to adjuvant chemotherapy.Results Patients were subdivided into triple negative (14.5%), HER2 (8.5%), luminal B (61.1%), and luminal A (15.9%). Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (P values with luminal B as referent) were 67% (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hugh, J., Hanson, J., Cheang, M. C. U., Nielsen, T. O., Perou, C. M., Dumontet, C., … Vogel, C. (2009). Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: Use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(8), 1168–1176. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free