Immunization of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) against Lactococcus garvieae using vaccine mixtures

18Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The effectiveness of vaccine mixtures against lactococcosis was tested in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The M1 strain of Lactococcus garvieae, isolated from a recent outbreak of lactococcosis at a rainbow trout farm in Turkey, was used in a trial comparing five immunization treatments: (a) formalin inactivated bacterin (vaccine), (b) the above bacterin together with Freund's Incomplete Adjuvant (FIA), (c) the bacterin combined with β-glucan, (d) β-glucan only, and (e) phosphate buffered saline-PBS (control). Fish were given intrapritoneal injections and challenged by exposure to the bacteria 30, 75, or 125 days after vaccination. In fish exposed to the bacteria 30 days after injection, the relative percent survival (RPS) was 88.89% in the group that received only bacterin and 100% in the group that received the bacterin combined with FIA. Immunity remained high in the bacterin+FIA group, as the RPS in this group remained 100% in fish challenged at 75 days, significantly higher than in all other groups. In fish exposed to the bacteria 125 days after vaccination, the RPS was 54.55% in fish vaccinated with the bacterin only and 84.84% in fish vaccinated with bacterin+FIA. In the group that received only β-glucan, immunity did not improve after vaccination. Micro-agglutination tests of serums showed that immunized fish produced antibodies at high titers within 30 days. In short, the formalin-inactivated M1 strain provided longer lasting protection against Lactococcus garvieae in rainbow trout when combined with FIA than when administered alone or with β-glucan.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kubilay, A., Altun, S., Ulukoy, G., Ekici, S., & Diler, O. (2008). Immunization of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) against Lactococcus garvieae using vaccine mixtures. Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh, 60(4), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.20500

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free