Nucleotide composition of CO1 sequences in Chelicerata (arthropoda): Detecting new mitogenomic rearrangements

50Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Here we study the evolution of nucleotide composition in third codon-positions of CO1 sequences of Chelicerata, using a phylogenetic framework, based on 180 taxa and three markers (CO1, 18S, and 28S rRNA; 5,218 nt). The analyses of nucleotide composition were also extended to all CO1 sequences of Chelicerata found in GenBank (1,701 taxa). The results show that most species of Chelicerata have a positive strand bias in CO1, i.e., in favor of C nucleotides, including all Amblypygi, Palpigradi, Ricinulei, Solifugae, Uropygi, and Xiphosura. However, several taxa show a negative strand bias, i.e., in favor of G nucleotides: all Scorpiones, Opisthothelae spiders and several taxa within Acari, Opiliones, Pseudoscorpiones, and Pycnogonida. Several reversals of strandspecific bias can be attributed to either a rearrangement of the control region or an inversion of a fragment containing the CO1 gene. Key taxa for which sequencing of complete mitochondrial genomes will be necessary to determine the origin and nature of mtDNA rearrangements involved in the reversals are identified. Acari, Opiliones, Pseudoscorpiones, and Pycnogonida were found to show a strong variability in nucleotide composition. In addition, both mitochondrial and nuclear genomes have been affected by higher substitution rates in Acari and Pseudoscorpiones. The results therefore indicate that these two orders are more liable to fix mutations of all types, including base substitutions, indels, and genomic rearrangements. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arabi, J., Judson, M. L. I., Deharveng, L., Lourenço, W. R., Cruaud, C., & Hassanin, A. (2012). Nucleotide composition of CO1 sequences in Chelicerata (arthropoda): Detecting new mitogenomic rearrangements. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 74(1–2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-012-9490-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free