Model checking and satisfiability for sabotage modal logic

43Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We consider the sabotage modal logic SML which was suggested by van Benthem. SML is the modal logic equipped with a 'transition-deleting' modality and hence a modal logic over changing models. It was shown that the problem of uniform model checking for this logic is PSPACE-complete. In this paper we show that, on the other hand, the formula complexity and the program complexity are linear, resp., polynomial time. Further we show that SML lacks nice model-theoretic properties such as bisimulation invariance, the tree model property, and the finite model property. Finally we show that the satisfiability problem for SML is undecidable. Therefore SML seems to be more related to FO than to usual modal logic. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Löding, C., & Rohde, P. (2003). Model checking and satisfiability for sabotage modal logic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2914, 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24597-1_26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free