Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis

Abstract

This study aimed to answer the following question: What is the proportion of acceptance reported by parents toward pediatric behavior guidance techniques (BGTs)? Observational studies that evaluated parental acceptance of BGTs during pediatric dental visits among parents of non-special health care need (non-SHCN) and SHCN children were included. A search of the Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS), MedLine/PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, in addition to gray literature, was performed until October 2021. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies was used for quality assessment. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (Grade). Fifty-three studies with 4868 participants were included, and 42 were retained for the random-effects proportion meta-analysis. The methodological quality varied from low to high. The agreement with the BGTs varied from 85.6% (95%CI: 77.5–92.1; p < 0.001; I2 = 93.6%; 16 studies; n = 1399) for tell-show-do to 25.7% (95%CI: 17.8–34.4; p < 0.001; I2 = 90.4%; 12 studies; n = 1129) for passive protective stabilization among non-SHCN children’s parents; meanwhile, among the parents of SHCN children, it varied from 89.1% (95%CI: 56.1–99.7; p < 0.001; I2 = 95.7%; 3 studies; n = 454) for tell-show-do to 29.1% (95%CI: 11.8–50.0; p = 0.001; I2 = 84.8%; 3 studies; n = 263) for general anesthesia. The effect estimates varied greatly, as substantial heterogeneity across studies was observed, thus limiting the confidence in the results. Parents were more likely to agree with basic BGTs over advanced BGTs, with very low certainty of evidence. Dentists should discuss BGT options with parents. Protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42018103834.