Are multiple descriptions better than one?

4Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper we compare three schemes for error recovery for real-time multimedia applications: media-dependent forward error correction (MD-FEC), proposed for real-time audio; media-independent forward error correction (MI-FEC), proposed for real-time video; and multiple description coding (MDC). We provide a detailed queueing analysis for these schemes considering bursty traffic sources, and combine results from information theory and queueing theory to analyze their performance. We conclude that MDC always performs better than MD-FEC, and that the average loss probability plays a key role in the choice of the optimal parameters. We also show that MDC outperforms MI-FEC if packet losses are highly correlated, like in the current Internet, and if the delay available for error control is low. © IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dán, G., Fodor, V., & Karlsson, G. (2005). Are multiple descriptions better than one? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3462, pp. 684–696). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11422778_55

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free