Experimental adhesion model: Effect of viscosities of fluids put in the peritoneal cavity on preventing peritoneal adhesions

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study we assessed the effectiveness of fluid viscosities placed in the peritoneal cavity to prevent postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Thirty-six Wistar albino female rats (average weight: 160 ± 30 g, average age: 6.5 months) were divided into three groups of equal number. A standard adhesion pattern was formed in each group. Then, 3 ml isotonic sodium chloride solution (relative viscosity value: 1) was added into the peritoneal cavity of group 1; 3 ml standard 6% hydroxy ethyl starch solution (HES) (relative viscosity value: 2.9) was added into the peritoneal cavity of group 2; and a standard HES solution that was concentrated by dehydration (relative viscosity value: 249.7) was added into the peritoneal cavity of group 3. All rats were sacrificed on postoperative day 10 and the adhesions that formed were graded. In group 1, grade-3 adhesions developed in 9 (75%) rats, and grade-2 developed in 3 (25%) rats. In group 2, grade-3 adhesions developed in 1 (8.3%) rat, grade-2 developed in 6 (50%) rats, and grade-1 developed in 5 (41.6%) rats; in group 3, grade-3 adhesions developed in 9 (75%) rats, and grade-2 developed in 3 (25%) rats. The adhesion scores of group 3 and group 1 were equal to each other (P=1), while the adhesion score of group 2 was significantly less (χ2:18.23, P<0.001). Increasing the viscosity of fluids that are inserted in the peritoneal cavity may reduce the formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesions till a critical value of unknown viscosity is achieved. The mechanism behind this process remains unclear.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aysan, E., Basak, F., Kinaci, E., Yanar, H., & Coskun, H. (2007). Experimental adhesion model: Effect of viscosities of fluids put in the peritoneal cavity on preventing peritoneal adhesions. Experimental Animals, 56(5), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.56.349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free