Emotional Sensibility: Exploring the Methodological and Ethical Implications of Research Participants' Emotions

1Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although political science increasingly investigates emotions as variables, it often ignores emotions' larger significance due to their inherence in research with human subjects. Integrating emotions into conversations on methods and ethics, I build on the term ethnographic sensibility to conceptualize an emotional sensibility that seeks to glean the emotional experiences of people who participate in research. Methodologically, emotional sensibility sharpens attention to how participants' emotions are data, influence other data, and affect future data collection. Ethically, it supplements Institutional Review Boards' rationalist emphasis on information and cognitive capacity with appreciation for how emotions infuse consent, risk, and benefit. It thereby encourages thinking not only about emotional harm but also about emotions apart from harm and about emotional harms apart from trauma and vulnerability. I operationalize emotional sensibility by tracking four dimensions of research that affect participants' emotions: the content of research, the context in which research occurs, researchers' positionality, and researchers' conduct.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pearlman, W. (2023). Emotional Sensibility: Exploring the Methodological and Ethical Implications of Research Participants’ Emotions. American Political Science Review, 117(4), 1241–1254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001253

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free