Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and computed tomography density in acute ischemic stroke

99Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose - Diffusion-weighted MR imaging is very sensitive for the detection of restricted molecular water diffusion in acute ischemic stroke. CT is sensitive to net water uptake in ischemic edema. We compared the decrease in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in diffusion-weighted MR imaging with CT density changes to study the correlation between diffusion restriction and water uptake in acute stroke patients. Methods - Twenty-five patients with acute ischemic stroke of the anterior cerebral circulation underwent MR and CT imaging 1.3 to 5.4 hours after symptom onset. ADC and CT data were transferred into a common 3-dimensional space, and regions of decreased ADC (dADC) were superimposed onto the corresponding CT. Mean values of ADC and Hounsfield units (HU) were determined in comparison with the nonaffected hemisphere. Results - Mean decrease in ADC (dADC) was 170±53×10-6 mm2/s and corresponded to a decrease (dCT) in CT density of 1.3±0.7 HU. dCT showed a continuous linear decrease of 0.4 HU/h (r=0.55, P<0.01), whereas the decrease is ADC was almost complete after 1.5 hours. A correlation between the decrease in ADC and dCT was found (r=0.41, P=0.04). Conclusions - The severity of diffusion restriction correlates with net water uptake in acute ischemic stroke. However, the underlying pathophysiology and different time courses indicate a common reason rather than a direct causality for both phenomena. The time delay and low value of CT density changes provide a reasonable explanation for the higher sensitivity of MR imaging in ischemic stroke.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kucinski, T., Väterlein, O., Glauche, V., Fiehler, J., Klotz, E., Eckert, B., … Zeumer, H. (2002). Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and computed tomography density in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke, 33(7), 1786–1791. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000019125.80118.99

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free