Aportes del programa de investigación "curso de la acción" al análisis de la actividad de los profesores y a la formación

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article presents the conceptual and methodological foundations for the Course of Action research program as an alternative perspective for studying the work and continuing education of teachers in the school system. This program has two strongly-associated poles: an empirical pole, focused on analyzing the activities of different teaching practices, and a technological pole, seeking the design of educational situations that facilitate professional development and learning. The authors present the epistemological, theoretical and methodological postulates of the Course of Action program, and analyze contributions made by studies conducted from this perspective toward describing and understanding the work of teaching and designing pedagogical mechanisms for education. In particular the authors describe one of the most well-known mechanisms, NéoPass@ction, a French platform for an educational video that presents educational situations targeting young teachers beginning their professional careers.

References Powered by Scopus

Natural categories

1910Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perceived Problems of Beginning Teachers

1249Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transition Shock: The Beginning Teacher's Paradox Ellen Corcoran

111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Interactive voting systems as promoters of the transformation of individual and collective activity in master classes in higher education

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, J. S., Veyrunes, P., Martinic, S., & Ria, L. (2017). Aportes del programa de investigación “curso de la acción” al análisis de la actividad de los profesores y a la formación. Perfiles Educativos, 39(158), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2017.158.58789

Readers over time

‘18‘20‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

33%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 2

40%

Social Sciences 2

40%

Arts and Humanities 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0