The chicken and the Orphean egg: On the function of meaning and the meaning of function

  • Emmeche C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A central aspect of the relation between biosemiotics and biology is investigated by asking: Is a biological concept of function intrinsically related to a biosemiotic concept of sign action, and vice versa? A biological notion of function (as some process or part that serves some purpose in the context of maintenance and reproduction of the whole organism) is discussed in the light of the attempt to provide an understanding of life processes as being of a semiotic nature, i.e., constituted by sign actions. Does signification and communication in biology (e.g., intracellular communication) always presuppose an organism with distinct semiotic or quasi-semiotic functions? And, symmetrically, is it the case that functional relations are simply not conceivable without living sign action? The present note is just an introduction to a project aiming at elucidating the relations between biofunction and biosemiosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Emmeche, C. (2002). The chicken and the Orphean egg: On the function of meaning and the meaning of function. Sign Systems Studies, 30(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2002.30.1.02

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free