Sevoflurane provides greater protection of the myocardium than propofol in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

168Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Sevoflurane, like other halogenated anesthetics, has been shown to have a protective effect on the myocardium at risk after an ischemic injury. The current study tested the hypothesis that such beneficial effects, so far mainly seen in the laboratory, are reproducible in humans. Methods: After institutional review board approval, 20 patients scheduled to undergo elective off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery were randomized to receive general anesthesia with either sevoflurane or propofol. Except for this, anesthetic and surgical management was the same in both groups. For assessing myocardial injury, troponin I and myocardial fraction of creatine kinase were determined during the first 24 postoperative hours. Systemic hemodynamic variables were measured before, during, and after completion of coronary artery bypass. Results: Troponin I concentrations increased significantly more in propofol-anesthetized patients than in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane. Conclusion: Patients receiving sevoflurane for off-pump coronary artery surgery had less myocardial injury during the first 24 postoperative hours than patients receiving propofol. The results further support cardioprotective effects of sevoflurane.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Conzen, P. F., Fischer, S., Detter, C., & Peter, K. (2003). Sevoflurane provides greater protection of the myocardium than propofol in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology, 99(4), 826–833. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200310000-00013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free