Personalization Trade-offs in Designing a Dialogue-based Information System for Support-Seeking of Sexual Violence Survivors

5Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The lack of reliable, personalized information often complicates sexual violence survivors' support-seeking. Recently, there is an emerging approach to conversational information systems for support-seeking of sexual violence survivors, featuring personalization with wide availability and anonymity. However, a single best solution might not exist as sexual violence survivors have different needs and purposes in seeking support channels. To better envision conversational support-seeking systems for sexual violence survivors, we explore personalization trade-offs in designing such information systems. We implement a high-fidelity prototype dialogue-based information system through four design workshop sessions with three professional caregivers and interviewed with four self-identified survivors using our prototype. We then identify two forms of personalization trade-offs for conversational support-seeking systems: (1) specificity and sensitivity in understanding users and (2) relevancy and inclusiveness in providing information. To handle these trade-offs, we propose a reversed approach that starts from designing information and inclusive tailoring that considers unspecified needs, respectively.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

12Citations
43Readers
Get full text
8Citations
12Readers

SoK: Safer Digital-Safety Research Involving At-Risk Users

4Citations
20Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H., Hwang, Y., Lee, J., Kwon, Y., Park, Y., & Lee, J. (2022). Personalization Trade-offs in Designing a Dialogue-based Information System for Support-Seeking of Sexual Violence Survivors. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517484

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

44%

Design 2

22%

Social Sciences 2

22%

Engineering 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0