Transcriptome comparison reveals key candidate genes responsible for the unusual reblooming trait in tree peonies

32Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Tree peonies are important ornamental plants worldwide, but growing them can be frustrating due to their short and concentrated flowering period. Certain cultivars exhibit a reblooming trait that provides a valuable alternative for extending the flowering period. However, the genetic control of reblooming in tree peonies is not well understood. In this study, we compared the molecular properties and morphology of reblooming and non-reblooming tree peonies during the floral initiation and developmental processes. Using transcriptome sequencing technology, we generated 59,275 and 63,962 unigenes with a mean size of 698 bp and 699 bp from the two types of tree peonies, respectively, and identified eight differentially expressed genes that are involved in the floral pathways of Arabidopsis thaliana. These differentially regulated genes were verified through a detailed analysis of their expression pattern during the floral process by real time RT-PCR. From this combined analysis, we identified four genes, PsFT, PsVIN3, PsCO and PsGA20OX, which likely play important roles in the regulation of the reblooming process in tree peonies. These data constitute a valuable resource for the discovery of genes involved in flowering time and insights into the molecular mechanism of flowering to further accelerate the breeding of tree peonies and other perennial woody plants. © 2013 Zhou et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Blooming modes and morphology in LYH and HN throughout the year 2011. These analyses were performed through SEM. LYH: (A) Flowers on 1 May. (B) Lateral buds on 4 July. (C) Lateral buds on 2 September. (D) Dormant apical and lateral buds on 11 November. (E) Leaf primordia were formed on the flanks of the flat and narrow SAM of a bud in May. (F) The meristem enlarged, and bract primordia became visible in July. (G) The SAM became hollow, and pistal primordia arose in September. (H) All of the floral primordia were formed in November. HN: (I) Flowers on 20 May. (J) Outgrowth of annual terminal buds on 9 June. (K) Rapid floral initiation of lateral buds on 2 July. (L) Reblooming on 15 August. (M) Lateral buds without sprouting on 5 September. (N) Dormancy buds on 26 November. (O) Leaf primordia arose in the SAM in May. (P) Bract primordia arose from the floral meristem of outgrowth buds in early July. (Q) Pistal primordia arose from the SAM of the outgrowth buds in late July. (R) Bract primordia were rising from the enlarged SAM in non-sprouting buds in August. (S) Sepal primordia arose in the non-sprouting buds in September. (T) Most floral primordia were formed in November. SAM: shoot apical meristem; L: leaf primordia; B: bract primordia; FM: floral meristem; SP: sepal primordia; P: petal primordia; S: stamen primordia; G: pistil primordia. Bar = 50 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079996.g001
  • Table 1. Summary of HN and LYH transcriptome sequencing
  • Table 2. Summary of HN and LYH transcriptome assembly
  • Table 3. Statistics on the number of unigenes in HN and LYH annotated with the NR, NT, Swiss-Prot, KEGG, and GO databases
  • Figure 3. Changes in the gene expression profile among the different floral inductions. The gene expression profiles were determined by RNA-Seq. The changes in the number of up-regulated and down-regulated genes between H1 and H2; L and H1; and L and H2 are summarized. The white box represents the up-regulated genes and the black box represents the down-regulated genes. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079996.g003
  • Figure 2. Histogram representation of GO classification for HN and LYH. The results are summarized in three main categories: biological process, cellular component, and biological function. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079996.g002
  • Figure 4. Functional enrichment analyses of DEGs in the GO annotation. The cluster frequency of the GO terms that were significantly enriched (P-value , 0.05) were analyzed in the three comparisons (H1-VS-H2, L-VS-H1, and L-VS-H2). The white box represents H1-VS-H2, the gray box represents L-VS-H1, and the black box represents L-VS-H2. A: cellular component; B: molecular function; C: biological process. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079996.g004
  • Table 4. Putative candidate genes of the DEGs associated with floral induction in tree peonies

References Powered by Scopus

Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome

15875Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq

11031Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

RNA-Seq: A revolutionary tool for transcriptomics

9923Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Characterisation and development of EST-SSR markers in tree peony using transcriptome sequences

98Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fatty acid composition of developing tree peony (Paeonia section Moutan DC.) seeds and transcriptome analysis during seed development

94Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The first high-density genetic map construction in tree peony (Paeonia Sect. Moutan) using genotyping by specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, H., Cheng, F. Y., Wang, R., Zhong, Y., & He, C. (2013). Transcriptome comparison reveals key candidate genes responsible for the unusual reblooming trait in tree peonies. PLoS ONE, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079996

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘19‘20‘21‘22‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

82%

Researcher 4

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22

76%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

17%

Environmental Science 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0