No laughing matter: Medical and social experiences of restricted growth

42Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

People with restricted growth have liminal status in the disability community. Because people with these conditions appear to live normal lives, they do not always define themselves as disabled or participate in the disability community, nor are they always identified as disabled people by others. This paper reports from a project seeking to fill the research gap around the social and medical impact of skeletal dysplasia, finding that adults with restricted growth experience a range of difficulties. These include medical problems, social stigma, and employment disadvantage. For these reasons, it makes sense to consider this group amongst the wider disabled population. © 2010 Nordic Network on Disability Research.

References Powered by Scopus

Disability rights and wrongs

1405Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Well, I know this is going to sound very strange to you, but I don't see myself as a disabled person: Identity and disability

296Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Medical complications of achondroplasia: A multicentre patient review

214Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

International Consensus Statement on the diagnosis, multidisciplinary management and lifelong care of individuals with achondroplasia

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How pupils on the autism spectrum make sense of themselves in the context of their experiences in a mainstream school setting: A qualitative metasynthesis

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disability rights and wrongs revisited, second edition

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shakespeare, T., Thompson, S., & Wright, M. (2010). No laughing matter: Medical and social experiences of restricted growth. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 12(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410902909118

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

44%

Psychology 3

33%

Design 1

11%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free