Clinical application of AIMS65 scores to predict outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage

26Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aims: To evaluate the ability of the recently proposed albumin, international normalized ratio (INR), mental status, systolic blood pressure, age >65 years (AIMS65) score to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Methods: AIMS65 scores were calculated in 251 consecutive patients presenting with acute UGIB by allotting 1 point each for albumin level <30 g/L, INR >1.5, alteration in mental status, systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg, and age ≥65 years. Risk stratification was done during the initial 12 hours of hospital admission. Results: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission, endoscopic therapy, or surgery were required in 51 patients (20.3%), 64 (25.5%), and 12 (4.8%), respectively. The predictive accuracy of AIMS65 scores ≥2 was high for blood transfusion (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.59), ICU admission (AUROC, 0.61), and mortality (AUROC, 0.74). The overall mortality was 10.3% (n=26), and was 3%, 7.8%, 20%, 36%, and 40% for AIMS65 scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively; these values were significantly higher in those with scores ≥2 (30.9%) than in those with scores <2 (4.5%, p<0.001). Conclusions: AIMS65 is a simple, accurate, non-endoscopic risk score that can be applied early (within 12 hours of hospital admission) in patients with acute UGIB. AIMS65 scores ≥2 predict high in-hospital mortality.

References Powered by Scopus

Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage

1194Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding

370Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation

289Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparison of clinical prediction tools and identification of risk factors for adverse outcomes in acute lower GI bleeding

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lower mortality with andexanet alfa vs 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for factor Xa inhibitor-related major bleeding in a U.S. hospital-based observational study

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is the AIMS 65 score useful in prepdicting clinical outcomes in Korean patients with variceal and nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding?

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thandassery, R. B., Sharma, M., John, A. K., Al-Ejji, K. M., Wani, H., Sultan, K., … Al-Kaabi, S. R. (2015). Clinical application of AIMS65 scores to predict outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Clinical Endoscopy, 48(5), 380–384. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.5.380

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

66%

Researcher 6

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 30

91%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

3%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

3%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free