A machine learning–Based model to predict early death among bone metastatic breast cancer patients: A large cohort of 16,189 patients

12Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to develop a prediction model to categorize the risk of early death among breast cancer patients with bone metastases using machine learning models. Methods: This study examined 16,189 bone metastatic breast cancer patients between 2010 and 2019 from a large oncological database in the United States. The patients were divided into two groups at random in a 90:10 ratio. The majority of patients (n = 14,582, 90%) were served as the training group to train and optimize prediction models, whereas patients in the validation group (n = 1,607, 10%) were utilized to validate the prediction models. Four models were introduced in the study: the logistic regression model, gradient boosting tree model, decision tree model, and random forest model. Results: Early death accounted for 17.4% of all included patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that older age; a separated, divorced, or widowed marital status; nonmetropolitan counties; brain metastasis; liver metastasis; lung metastasis; and histologic type of unspecified neoplasms were significantly associated with more early death, whereas a lower grade, a positive estrogen receptor (ER) status, cancer-directed surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy were significantly the protective factors. For the purpose of developing prediction models, the 12 variables were used. Among all the four models, the gradient boosting tree had the greatest AUC [0.829, 95% confident interval (CI): 0.802–0.856], and the random forest (0.828, 95% CI: 0.801–0.855) and logistic regression (0.819, 95% CI: 0.791–0.847) models came in second and third, respectively. The discrimination slopes for the three models were 0.258, 0.223, and 0.240, respectively, and the corresponding accuracy rates were 0.801, 0.770, and 0.762, respectively. The Brier score of gradient boosting tree was the lowest (0.109), followed by the random forest (0.111) and logistic regression (0.112) models. Risk stratification showed that patients in the high-risk group (46.31%) had a greater six-fold chance of early death than those in the low-risk group (7.50%). Conclusion: The gradient boosting tree model demonstrates promising performance with favorable discrimination and calibration in the study, and this model can stratify the risk probability of early death among bone metastatic breast cancer patients.

References Powered by Scopus

Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries

77246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer statistics, 2016

23670Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards better clinical prediction models: Seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation

1292Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Development and validation of a web-based artificial intelligence prediction model to assess massive intraoperative blood loss for metastatic spinal disease using machine learning techniques

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Breast Cancer Prediction using Machine Learning Models

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Machine learning-based prediction of hospital prolonged length of stay admission at emergency department: a Gradient Boosting algorithm analysis

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xiong, F., Cao, X., Shi, X., Long, Z., Liu, Y., & Lei, M. (2022). A machine learning–Based model to predict early death among bone metastatic breast cancer patients: A large cohort of 16,189 patients. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.1059597

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

25%

Engineering 1

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0