Person, Space, and Memory: Why Anthropology Needs Cognitive Science and Human Geography

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Among the Iatmul of the Sepik River in Papua New Guinea, conflicts over the rightful possession of cosmologically significant names are decided by having the opponents and their supporters meet near the ceremonial stool (pabu) in the men’s house for a special debate. The thousands of secret sacred names of persons and places that may be involved are central to the ramified Iatmul mythological system, which is anchored in the landscape and which combines the past and present. Demanding elaborate feats of rhetorical skill and memory facilitated by localized mental representations, such encounters involve mastery of highly complex intellectual activities that draw on comprehensive knowledge of Iatmul myths of origin, clans, totems, migration, and settlement. This chapter first presents excepts from such debate and explains that an anthropologist’s understanding of this complex system requires insights into research on human memory and learning capacities as well as competence in indigenous concepts of local geography.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wassmann, J. (2011). Person, Space, and Memory: Why Anthropology Needs Cognitive Science and Human Geography. In Knowledge and Space (Vol. 4, pp. 347–360). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8945-8_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free