Commentary: Technology as Material Ethics

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the case of a train disaster, everyone knows that something is amiss and ethical questions will automatically arise on who was responsible for what and to what degree. But more often, it is not so clear if something has gone wrong with our technologies. Then ethics seems not to play a role. This is not correct. I show how many ethical choices were made during the design stage of the train: the final design realizes some values at the expense of others. Each technology apportions responsibilities in complex ways between people and things. And even a well functioning technology has intended and unintended, foreseen and unforeseen, desirable and undesirable consequences that can affect the rights and interests of people, or that are important for what they see as a good life. If we accept that our lives are greatly determined by the technology around us, it is of paramount importance that we more regularly investigate or scrutinize how that technology helps to shape ourselves and our relationships with others.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Swierstra, T. (2011). Commentary: Technology as Material Ethics. In Issues in Business Ethics (Vol. 28, pp. 177–182). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9334-9_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free