A national test of dyslexia

5Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Different definitions and tests of dyslexia can cause unfairness and make life difficult for people with dyslexia as well as for the professionals. In 2012, the Danish government decided to support the fight against dyslexia. The government issued a public tender for the development of “a standardized, electronically administered test of dyslexia for use […] from primary Grade 3 and up through all educational levels to 5-year university education.” The present paper reports from the development of this National Dyslexia Test. The paper focuses on the definition of dyslexia and the composition, reliability, and validity of the test. Data from the development of the test demonstrate the psychometric properties of the test. Reliability was indicated by a high agreement between the two (computer-administered) measures that are part of the test. External convergent validity was indicated by a high agreement between test results and results from prior practice and by agreement between test results and reading comprehension of educational texts. The paper concludes with a discussion of the practical uses and potential issues with the test since its release in 2015.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Basic principles of ROC analysis

5118Citations
1778Readers
Get full text
1953Citations
1261Readers
Get full text
1363Citations
969Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Performance of dyslexia dataset for machine learning algorithms

0Citations
7Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poulsen, M., Juul, H., & Elbro, C. (2023). A national test of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 73(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-023-00285-5

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 3

50%

Computer Science 1

17%

Neuroscience 1

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0