Dose-response analysis of factors involved in germination and secondary dormancy of seeds of sisymbrium officinale: II. Nitrate

56Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The role of nitrate as a promoter of germination of Sisymbrium officinale seeds was examined in optimal light conditions. It was shown that the requirement for nitrate was absolute. This was true for all seed lots used. The probit of germination in water was log-linearly related to the level of endogenous nitrate. Preincubation at 15°C resulted in an immediate decrease in germination, whereas in 25 millimolar KNO3 the decrease was delayed. The decline of germination in water was strongly correlated with the rate at which nitrate leached from the seeds. The germination response to a range of KNO3 concentrations was followed during preincubation at 24-hour intervals. During the entire 264-hour preincubation period increasingly higher nitrate concentrations were required to maintain a response. This resulted in a right-hand shift of the dose-response curve parallel to the x axis. After 120 hours the high maximum germination level started to decline. The dose-response curves could be simulated by an equation from the receptor-occupancy theory. It is proposed that induction of secondary dormancy is a result of a decrease of the number of nitrate receptors. After 24 and 48 hours of preincubation, the nitrate-response curves were biphasic. The biphasic character could be related to the level of endogenous nitrate and to a differential requirement for nitrate of two fractions of the seed population. Similarities with the behavior of fluence-response curves after prolonged dark incubation led to the hypothesis that phytochrome and nitrate share the same site of action.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hilhorst, H. W. M. (1990). Dose-response analysis of factors involved in germination and secondary dormancy of seeds of sisymbrium officinale: II. Nitrate. Plant Physiology, 94(3), 1096–1102. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.3.1096

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free