Thinking intersectionally and why difference (still) matters in feminist leisure and sport research

15Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter examines methodological practice in feminist leisure and sport scholarship underpinned by a view of “thinking intersectionally”. Despite an increase in publications detailing and/or engaging intersectionality over recent years across social science research more broadly, intersectionality is not yet prevalent in leisure and sport scholarship. Black feminist perspectives are central to informing discussion on the challenges of researching difference and inequalities. The potential and possible ways of thinking intersectionally for future research engagement are explored, drawing on examples from the author’s feminist leisure research practice. The contexts of space and embodiment, as significant aspects of thinking intersectionally, along with ongoing feminist debates regarding reflexivity and insider-outsider issues, are given consideration in relation to how we identify the overall context of our research as well as the multiple contexts within which our research is carried out.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watson, B. (2017). Thinking intersectionally and why difference (still) matters in feminist leisure and sport research. In The Palgrave Handbook of Feminism and Sport, Leisure and Physical Education (pp. 313–334). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53318-0_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free