While non-state actors have recently proliferated, nomads we argue challenge sovereignty in ways others do not. Nomadism undermines states’ capacity to tax, conscript, and otherwise regulate population. However, nomadism constitutes an additional non-material threat to the modern territorial state. By disrupting states’ claims to territorial exclusivity, nomadism undermines the ideational foundations of statehood. States have responded to nomadism in three ways. Many forcibly settle nomads. Weak states, unable to secure borders, may allow nomads to migrate relatively freely. Others voluntarily facilitate freer migration by reducing the salience of borders.
CITATION STYLE
Levin, J., De Carvalho, G., Cavoukian, K., & Cuthbert, R. (2020). Before and after borders: The nomadic challenge to sovereign territoriality. In Nomad-State Relationships in International Relations: Before and After Borders (pp. 63–76). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28053-6_4
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.