Low-Cost and Lightweight Trans-Radial Prosthesis with Three Opposed Fingers Considering Functionality and Design

  • Yoshikawa M
  • Taguchi Y
  • Sakamoto S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

At present, there are body-powered hooks and myoelectric prosthetic hands that trans-radial amputees can use for work. Though the body-powered hook has good workability in detailed works, the design of the hook spoils its appearance and the harness impairs the feelings of wearing. The myoelectric prosthetic hand has a natural appearance similar to the human hand and intuitive operability with a myoelectric control system. However, it is high cost and heavyweight. Because of these problems, many amputees use cosmetic prostheses especially in Japan. In this paper, we report a low-cost and lightweight electric prosthesis with three opposed fingers considering functionality and design. A simple mechanism to control fingers by a linear actuator contributes to satisfactory workability, lightweight, and low cost. A control system using an inexpensive distance sensor allows intuitive operability as the myoelectric sensor at low cost. A socket is easily removable so that users can wear properly as the situation demands. It has a sophisticated appearance as a tool and can be produced by a 3D printer. The total weight of the hand and socket is 300 [g]. Evaluation tests utilizing Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) demonstrated that developed prosthesis was effective to operate light objects for daily use. Otto bock 1960 3 Myobock 5 Michelangelo Hand [2] Touch Bionics iLimb [3]RSL Steeper bebionic [4] 5 5 [5][12] Otto bock Myobock 150 500 900 [g]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yoshikawa, M., Taguchi, Y., Sakamoto, S., Yamanaka, S., Matsumoto, Y., Ogasawara, T., & Kawashima, N. (2014). Low-Cost and Lightweight Trans-Radial Prosthesis with Three Opposed Fingers Considering Functionality and Design. Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 32(5), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.7210/jrsj.32.456

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free