Prevalence and safety of off-label use of chemotherapeutic agents in older patients with breast cancer: Estimates from seer-medicare data

19Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Prescribing drugs outside of the label indication is legal and may reflect standard practice; however, some off-label use may be inappropriate. This study measured the prevalence and safety of off-label use both in accordance with practice guidelines and inconsistent with practice guidelines in older patients with breast cancer. Patients and Methods: The SEER-Medicare data set was used to identify women diagnosed with breast cancer. Intravenous chemotherapy was identified using Medicare claims and classified as either on-label, off-label but included in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Breast Cancer ("off-label/supported"). Or Off-label and Not Included in the NCCN Guidelines . Hospitalization/emergency Dept. Admission Rates Were Compared. Results: A Total of 13,347 Women Were Treated with 16,127 Regimens ; 64% of Regimens Were Off-label/supported, 25% Were On-label, and 11% Were Off-label/unsupported, and Hospitalization/ED Admission Occurred in 27%, 25%, and 32% of Regimens, Respectively . Drugs Never Included in the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer Accounted for 19% of Off-label/unsupported Use . Conclusions: Off-label Use Without Sci. Support Was Not Com., whereas 64% of Use Was Off-label/supported, Reflecting the Fact That Widely Accepted Indications Are Often Not Tested in Registration Trials. Off-label/supported Use Will Likely Increase As More Drugs Are Expected to Have Activ. Across Cancer Sites, and Therefore Understanding the Implications of Such Use Is Critical.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eaton, A. A., Sima, C. S., & Panageas, K. S. (2016). Prevalence and safety of off-label use of chemotherapeutic agents in older patients with breast cancer: Estimates from seer-medicare data. JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 14(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2016.0007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free