Efficacious, effective, and embedded interventions: Implementation research in infectious disease control

38Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Research in infectious disease control is heavily skewed towards high end technology; development of new drugs, vaccines and clinical interventions. Oft ignored, is the evidence to inform the best strategies that ensure the embedding of interventions into health systems and amongst populations. In this paper we undertake an analysis of the challenge in the development of research for the sustainable implementation of disease control interventions. Results. We highlight the fundamental differences between the research paradigms associated with the development of technologies and interventions for disease control on the one hand and the research paradigms required for enhancing the sustainable uptake of those very same interventions within the communities on the other. We provide a definition for implementation research in an attempt to underscore its critical role and explore the multidisciplinary science needed to address the challenges in disease control. Conclusion. The greatest value for money in health research lies in the sustainable and effective implementation of already proven, efficacious solutions. The development of implementation research that can help provide some solutions on how this can be achieved is sorely needed. © 2008 Allotey et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allotey, P., Reidpath, D. D., Ghalib, H., Pagnoni, F., & Skelly, W. C. (2008). Efficacious, effective, and embedded interventions: Implementation research in infectious disease control. BMC Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-343

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free