Supplemental maternal oxygen therapy during caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia: a comparison of nasal prongs and facemask

13Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Forty healthy parturients at term, undergoing elective Caesarean section, were divided into two groups to receive supplemental oxygen by either simple facemask (Group FM, 8 L · min-1) or nasal prongs (Group NP, 4 L · min-1) during the procedure. Anaesthesia was provided by épidural block to equivalent dermatomal levels in all patients. Maternal oxygen saturation was measured continuously with pulse oximetry and supplemental oxygen was provided to the mother after administration of the épidural test dose and continued until the end of the procedure. Following delivery of the infant and concurrent with Apgar scoring, the umbilical cord was double-clamped and arterial and venous samples were drawn. The pH, partial pressures of O2 and CO2 and O2 saturations were measured. There was no différence in the clinical condition of the neonates, as assessed by Apgar scores, or in the acid-base and oxygenation status, as assessed by blood gas analyses between the two groups. Mean umbilical vein oxygen saturation, a measure of fetal oxygen delivery, was 46 ± 18% (95% confidence interval 39% to 54%) for Group NP and 54 ± 17% (95% confidence interval 46% to 62%) for Group FM, again not different. We conclude that when the clinical condition, acid-base and oxygenation status of neonates, delivered by elective Caesarean section to healthy, low-risk parturients with normal placental function under épidural anaesthesia, are evaluated, it makes no différence whether the mothers received supplemental oxygen by nasal prongs or simple facemask. © 1992 Canadian Anesthesiologists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crosby, E. T., & Halpern, S. H. (1992). Supplemental maternal oxygen therapy during caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia: a comparison of nasal prongs and facemask. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 39(4), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03009039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free